Excerpt - King's Ransom

King's Ransom excerpt, continued....

Of course, if the monster were really friendly, as it now seemed to be, John faced a really horrifying dilemma, worse in some ways than if it were ravening. There was no precedent in any of the tales and songs for dealing with a friendly monster. Of course, you killed monsters, but then they were always trying to kill you. Might it not be dishonourable to, as it were, murder one? On the other hand, it was practically a Sacred Duty to slay monsters. God’s Legs, they practically existed to be slain. It might be a craven and cowardly act not to kill it. On the other hand, it was looking at him so trustingly, he didn’t think he could do it even if armed with the sword that in his minds’ eye he could see so clearly, propped in a corner of the solar, the cheerful flames dancing off its gleaming scabbard from the fireplace.

Suddenly John wanted a hot bath more than anything in the world.

Interview with Patti Roberts - on writing episodic fiction, and the Witchwood Estate series

My guest today is Patti Roberts.

Ms Roberts is the author of the well known Paradox Series, and the phenomenally popular new Witchwood Estate series.



TC: Welcome to my blog, Ms Roberts, and thank you for coming.
In your new series, Witchwood Estate, you've departed from the conventional novel format. Can you tell us a bit about that?

Patti Roberts: Well, sometimes I think people just enjoy a quick read - nothing too overwhelming - the young and the not so young.

TC: And this new format, episodic fiction, certainly provides that. How did you come up with the idea for it?

Patti Roberts: I love TV series, so I thought that I would like to use that same format in ebooks - I believe episodic fiction is perfect for the ebook format. I think the series would also adapt into a great graphic novel, or comic - not to mention a TV series.

TC: That's an intriguing thought - a TV series. These Witchwood books are very visual, and would adapt well to a television format, I'm sure. Whom would you get to play the leading roles, if you had the choice?

Patti Roberts: That’s a very good question. The first actress I thought of for a Witchwood Estate character was Aria Montgomery, from Pretty Little Liars, to play Kat Abbots.

TC: And how about the big one - Alexandria? Any candidates in mind for her?

Patti Roberts: You know, I haven't had time to source any others yet - Kat's character just jumped out and me when I saw a pic of Aria on facebook - I said Yep. That's Kat! I would love readers to let me know who they think would make a great actress to play Alexandria - blond and sweet - maybe Britt Robertson, from Secret Circle, and for River, Chris Zylka from the same show.

TC: Well, there you go, readers - your opportunity to have your own input to this phenomenally popular series when it's televised!
So, from the point of view of the actual craft, how does writing this way, in episodes, compare with your previous experiences of writing more conventional novels? How has your work style had to change to accommodate the new format?

Patti Roberts: It hasn't changed that much at all, other than working to a shorter deadline. They are shorter stories, so for that reason it takes less time to finish an episode. I'd really like to bring out a new episode every six to eight weeks, but due to other commitments I can't manage that right now. Soon, hopefully, because I really love writing this series. It also really helps having them edited as I go, then a final edit at the end just before publication.

TC: Yes, and I'm sure your readers appreciate your commitment to quality in your work. So, what would you say are the main benefits to working this way?

Patti Roberts: I like to think I work better under pressure. I love knowing that the next instalment is only months away at the most - not a year as is quite often the case with larger novels. And so many more opportunities for cliffhanger endings - I know some people hate that, but I am not one of them.

TC: And the downside, if any?

Patti Roberts: In my opinion none! I way prefer TV series to movies - they last longer, and you have more opportunities to bond with the characters. Although I do understand that some stories suit a movie version rather than a TV series.

Interview with Patti Roberts - On Writing Episodic Fiction, and the Witchwood Estate series - part II

TC: Indeed! And is there anything else you'd like to share with our readers today? Anything perhaps about your coming episode, or anything at all?

Patti Roberts: Just that I am so thrilled with this new series! An author friend of mine (Patricia Puddle) asked me today - "Do you ever take a day off for fun?" my answer was ... "Writing is fun. And taking a day off from it is not." I may not write every day, but my mind is constantly ticking over with new ideas, new twists, new plots, characters ... cliffhangers - now that is FUN! I love brainstorming with Leslie Hansford - we have spent hours doing that. FUN! Book 3 has a few new twists. A death ... and another new main Character introduced to sweep our leading ladies off their feet ...
Oh, and I can't finish without mentioning my wonderful team that help me make each episode of Witchwood Estate a reality:
Tabitha Ormiston-Smith - Proofreading & Editing, Leslie Hansford – Proofreading, Plot and Storyline Assistant, Chris Taylor (The Pagan Wildwood) – Poems, and Kathleen Evans (RavensWing), Advisory Witch.

Well, there you have it, readers - could episodic fiction be the next big thing to hit the publishing world? It certainly worked for Mr Dickens. Send your thoughts on this to me at Tabitha.Ormiston.Smith@gmail.com.

And if you have an opinion on who should play Alexandria in the television series of Witchwood Estate, send your nomination to Ms Roberts at pattiroberts7@gmail.com. One lucky reader will win free e-copies of episodes 1 and 2 of Witchwood Estate.

 

And finally, here is the author's dream cast.

ON THE TILES; INTO THE NIGHT

Another of the errors that I often see is inappropriate word choice following from an apparent failure to understand the difference between "in" and "into", and between "on" and "onto".

This difference is actually quite simple, and can be summed up by saying that where there is a "to", there is always movement. It's quite logical, isn't it - when you move, you go from one place TO another place. Hence, whenever you are writing about some situation where there is movement, whether implied or express, then "into" and "onto" are the go. When the situation is static, it's "in" and "on".

For example, consider the old and popular saying, "The cat sat on the mat." A cat sitting is not going anywhere. Therefore "on" is quite appropriate. "The cat sat onto the mat" is just wrong, right?
However, this isn't where the majority of people go astray. The common mistake is in using "in" or "on" when the situation is dynamic.

Consider this sentence: "He placed his gun on the desk."


This is another of the same form as "The cat sat on the mat." When you place something somewhere, there it sits, static and unmoving. "On" is therefore quite appropriate - but look at what happens when we change the verb to something that indicates movement.

"He slid his gun on the desk."

Now this is the single most common mistake that I see being made in this context. Let's look at why it is wrong. The sentence now shows us a man sliding a gun about on the surface of a desk - but that is not what the author meant - the sliding was to be how the gun got from his hand to the desk - he slid it on. Do you see how using the wrong word has completely altered the sense of the sentence? If we say, more correctly, "He slid his gun onto the desk," we see, as we are meant to do, the man sliding the gun onto the desk.

Similarly with "in" - I very often see sentences like "She walked in the room." This is particularly rife among American writers, and of course their spoken dialect allows this usage in casual speech, at least among certain groups. But in narrative, again, it distorts the meaning of the sentence away from what the writer intends. "She walked in the room" is equivalent to "she walked in the garden" - i.e. she was in the room walking about. But when the sentence is meant to depict the person entering a room, it is misleading, and if despite this the writer's true meaning is evident from the context, it looks rough and illiterate.

Hyphens Made Easy

One of the most common problems that I encounter in my work is a lack of understanding of what a hyphen is for, and a resulting inappropriate use of it.

In the most common situation in which there is an opportunity to use a hyphen, there is a noun and two adjectives. For example: silver-haired gentleman. Late-blooming flowers.

The hyphen is used to show more clearly the relationship between the noun and its accompanying adjectives.

In order to know whether to use a hyphen or not, you need to establish what these relationships are. There’s an easy way to do this.

For each adjective, ask yourself whether the adjective describes a quality of the noun, or is there to modify the other adjective.

EG: silver haired gentleman. In this case, we ask ourselves: Does the gentleman have hair (haired)? Yes, he does, so “haired” modifies the noun.

Is the gentleman silver? NO! He is not. It is the HAIR that is silver. Therefore, silver goes with haired, and a hyphen should be used (silver-haired).

In the second example, “late blooming flowers”, the same process is used. Do the flowers bloom? Yes, they do! So blooming modifies the noun. Are the flowers late? NO! It is their blooming that is late. Therefore, late goes with blooming, and a hyphen should be used.

There are some cases where this does not happen. Consider, for instance, “big strong man”. Is the man strong? Yes. Is the man big? YES! Therefore, you see, BOTH adjectives go with the noun. In this case you do not use a hyphen; they are two separate attributes and so each stands alone. Just separate them with a comma: “big, strong man”.

Ask yourself these questions every time you have two adjectives with a noun. After a while, it will become automatic and you won’t have to think about it.

Now I Have Seen Everything!

I opened the little gold box with some anticipation. It had been a gift from my niece, part of a gift basket, and I'd been saving it for some special happy occasion. Tonight, on the eve of my birthday, seemed like the right time.

The soap didn't look like anything special - in fact it looked exactly like the udder soap my school friend used to have on her dairy farm. That udder soap, though, I remembered, was great stuff. We used it to make our hair shiny.

I smelled it, wondering if it would go with either or both of my current perfumes. There's nothing worse than a nasty clash between your soap and your cologne. It didn't smell like anything particular either. That surprised me; with a pretentious name like Solid Gold, I expected it to be scented at least. I looked at the box. Solid Gold bath soap, weight when packed, 100g. OK. I turned the box over. It was a product of a company called Universal Brands Pty Ltd - an oxymoron if ever I'd heard one. I was looking to see what it was supposed to smell like, if anything. Then I read the following:

Directions: Work soap into a lather, smooth on body with moistened hands or wash cloth, then rinse.

Is this what we have come to? Where people need directions on how to use a bar of soap? This scares me worse than the terrifying list of chemical ingredients.

FACING THE DAY 101 - For when you just can’t.

STEP 1.

OK. You're majorly depressed. You cannot face the day or your life. You have been staring at the ceiling for 2 hours without mustering the ability to leave your bed unless bladder pressure got you to the bathroom.

I want you to do one thing. Just one. Get up and make your bed.

Do not take this as a sign to yourself that you have to stay up. Once your bed is made, you can get right back in and stay there all day if you still want to. I will not say anything.

Making your bed is a little gift to yourself. You are making that bed a haven, pleasant and comfortable to get into whenever you do decide to. Whether it is in 5 minutes or 16 hours. Remember - it is your bed and you can get in it any time you want.

Smooth out the bottom sheet and arrange the pillows nicely. Tuck in the blankets if you have them, or just lay out the doona. Whatever it takes. If you are really at rock bottom and there are no sheets on the bed, go and get some and put them on.

There, you have done it. Take a moment to admire your work. DO NOT look around at your messy room. We are focussing on the bed here. It is really nice and it is all for you because you deserve it.

Right, now you can get back in bed if you still want to. But perhaps you feel you might be able to manage a small step forward? If so, read on.

STEP 2

We are heading for the bathroom. Brush your teeth and get under the shower. This is not the time to save water. Be generous with the hot water and let it relieve your kinked shoulders and aching back. Wash your hair if it needs it. It probably does. When you get out, don't just dry off and leave it there. Get yourself up as if you were going out or to work. Use your gel, mousse, blow dryer, whatever you use to make yourself look nice. Put on makeup if you wear it. Use your moisturiser. Shave if you're a guy. Spray on scent if you have it.

Don't you feel better?

Don't stop here, go back to your room and get dressed. Really dressed, in clean stuff from your closet, not trackies from the floor or under your bed. Jeans and a t-shirt is fine, but they should be clean ones, and you must wear your shoes. Don't be afraid to wear your shoes, you can take them off just as easily as you put them on. Get out a clean handkerchief if you use them.

Now take a look at yourself in a mirror. A full-length one if you have one.

Smile. Come on you can paste one on your face. Notice how nice you look. Remember you are not looking and comparing yourself to someone you saw in some dodgy fashion magazine. You are comparing yourself to what you saw when you first walked in the bathroom (if you even let yourself look :)) Don't worry about what anyone else thinks of your looks. How dare they even have an opinion?

You will notice two things. One is that you are way, way better looking than you thought you were. The second thing is that you are a lot more capable than you thought half an hour ago.

There; you have done really well. Now, if you still want to, you can go back to bed.